I have spent the last week in S. Florida on a business trip. My whole Chicago office (five people) went to Ft. Lauderdale to meet with our team members there (15 people). I have been aware in past meetings of the cultural gaps between these groups, so I made a point to note them as they occurred this week. I have struggled trying to synthesize this material in order to present it in a some cohesive fashion. But I realize that the cultural differences and resulting culture shock have left me mute. I don’t know how to wrap my head around them, therefore I will simply list them here.
- No mention of Trayvon Martin. In the week leading up to the closing arguments and verdict on the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin case, not one of the Florida residents discussed the case with us–even though the trial was showing 24/7 on the lobby monitors. This case has been of particular interest over the past year with the Chicago group, and we’ve spent hours over lunches, breaks, etc. talking about racism, what constitutes justice, etc. It has impacted our lives. But even after the closing arguments were made, not a single word was mentioned of the case by any of my Florida colleagues.
- There is a bizarre combination of machismo and hyperfeminity in the S. Florida office. The men’s interests were either ‘gay’ (focus on bodies, musicals, and trash talk gossip) or machismo (motorcycles, sea runners, muscles, etc.). The women wore full make up, mini skirt suits raised up to there and cut down to there, and platform five inch heels: they hobbled awkwardly from meeting to meeting. The Chicago group wanted to talk politics, reform, ecology, poverty, postcolonialism, consumerism, philosophy, and religion. The Chicago women wore slacks, flat shoes, minimal make up: and our feminist hackles were raised over women who hobbled themselves for fashion.
- There was an utter lack of sensitivity to colonialist discourse. Our boss was downplaying the possibility of any raises or additional perks this year, and said as a means of making her point: “You know, the natives in third world countries are happy to get a t-shirt. They don’t expect more than a t-shirt. They get a t-shirt and think that’s pretty cool. You need to think like those third world people.” And later we listened to a presentation about ‘smart tribes’, creature/critter mentality, idea monkeys, and the need for dom/sub swapping (dominant/submissive swapping roles). The entire Chicago team sat there with mouths agape. One colleague from Columbia was jokingly referred to as ‘the Drug Lord’. The Florida team laughed heartily: apparently this is an ongoing joke.
- TV: this ice breaker left me cold. In one of the ice breaker exercises, we were asked to name what guilty pleasure TV show we watched. The S. Florida team named various reality TV shows. The Chicago team responded with confusion: “I don’t watch much besides the news and sports”; “I don’t own a TV”; “I have kids… I don’t have time for TV”; “I have a TV but I made my own rabbit ears and they don’t work very well…”; and “It has been years since I sat down and watched TV.” To which one of our S. Florida colleagues replied, “If you don’t have TV, what do you watch?” We were speechless. Finally one of the young women from the Chicago group said “I don’t watch anything. I do things–I go out, participate in community theater, I read.”
- Reading. The comment about Chicagoans reading resulted in a certain form of defensiveness from the S. Florida group. Our boss said “Folk here read. We have readers in our group. But then we go and watch the movie made about the book.” And once again, the Chicago group just gaped.
- Guns. For the evening entertainment, the S. Florida group discussed the possibility of going to a realistic police training firing range where you can load a video feed of the streets of your home town, and shoot at people. “It is SO cool!” The Chicago team refused.
- Materialism. The focus on acquisition of goods was overwhelming. Waste was viewed as the ultimate luxury. Our boss bragged about having thrown a corporate party with a budget of half a million dollars. “We found this really cute candy store in Manhattan. It was perfect. The CEO said “Make it happen” so we rented it for the event. The owner was concerned about his goods, so the CEO just bought out the store to put the owner at ease. Then we could eat all the candy we wanted.” The Chicago group were once again nothing short of stunned at the opulence and waste, especially in light of the layoffs we’d been through and the intention with which we strive to not be consumers (wearing second hand clothes, recycling, reusing, etc.).
So I write all this to say that I’ve not experienced that kind of culture shock in a while.
But no… that’s not true.
I was down in Southern Illinois for the 4th of July and we attended the fireworks at the county airport. We parked our little car on the grassy lot, and were quickly surrounded by large four-door over-sized pickup trucks: guys sitting in the back in lawn chairs, drinking beer, spitting tobacco, throwing fire crackers and smoke bombs off the tailgate, Toby Keith blaring offensive lyrics from ginormous speakers. I felt in a foreign land.
And now I don’t know how to go on. There is much disparity in these states we call ‘United”.
Looks like a good start to your “Top 10 (or 100)” reasons why you’ll turn down any job transfers to the Florida office that come your way. Oy!
Yeah. That point was made clear a few years ago when they approached me about moving down there. UGH.
I liked these observations. To what extent is organizational culture reflective of a combination of locale and leadership?
Oh… I think its definitely both locale and leadership. They are inseparable.